Health Care Reform promises to ensure that all Americans have access to medical coverage. The most pressing concern is the fact that many children are without coverage and the care they need now, so the bill states that by September 23rd, 2010, no child can be denied coverage due to pre-existing conditions. While this is well needed, it does bring to light the fact that there is an increasing shortage of Pediatric Specialists. With an influx of new patients entering the system, and the demand for both medically necessary and non-medically necessary treatments rising, will there be enough physicians to handle the load?
Posts Tagged ‘Universal Health Care’
Lack of Pediatric Specialists a Growing Concern
Wednesday, May 12th, 2010The First Year for Health Care Reform – Step One
Thursday, March 25th, 2010Though some fine tuning will be taking place, the plan for implementing the Health Care Reform Bill during the first year will (most likely) look something like this:
- Dependent children will be eligible to stay covered under their parent’s plan until their 26th birthday. The House is still pushing to make this coverage last through their 26th birthday.
- Insurers can no longer impose exclusions on pre-existing conditions in children. Children are considered exempt from this until their 19th birthday
- Lifetime maximums on benefits and annual limits on coverage will be discontinued
Health Care Reform is here! What does this mean for you?
Monday, March 22nd, 2010No one really knows! It seems that revisions are made by the hour, and nothing is quite set in stone as of yet. Also (as of this hour) 11 states have filed lawsuits stating that the bill is unconstitutional, in that it forces people to pay for coverage or face financial penalties. Does it promise to cover all Americans? Supposedly, by 2014, after spending the next few years inching towards this goal by means of guaranteed issue policies, no lifetime maximum amounts, the cessation of policy rescission’s, etc. Once this is in place, individual policies would be purchased via an exchange:
Brown's Victory & What it Means for Health Care Reform
Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010Health Care reform faced yet another setback as Massachusetts State Senator Scott Brown received 51.9% of the vote needed to fill late Senator Kennedy’s seat in the US Senate. This now makes the Republican head count 41, thereby bringing the 60-count Democrats were relying on to pass the health care reform legislation to an end. Brown’s strong statements regarding the negative portions of the bill, such as higher taxes and the destruction of jobs, played a major role in his political success. However, ironic that he fills the seat of a major proponent of universal health care, many are breathing a sigh of relief as the thought is while health care reform is much needed, it is something that needs to be dealt with carefully – not a “fix it later” attitude.
Oppose the Public Plan NOW!
Friday, July 10th, 2009As you all are aware, the debate regarding the future of our nation’s health care system is raging in Congress right now.
On behalf of our agency, we have dedicated extensive time to educate ourselves and our clients about the most effective ways to improve the health care system. We strongly feel that a public plan will not increase competition in the health insurance industry because it can never occur on an equal playing field. We also feel that the role of the agent is critical, and that to overlook the services that agents provide is a mistake. Our clients have enjoyed over thirty years of superior customer support from our agency, and to take that away would be detrimental.
SB 810 (LENO) The California Universal Healthcare Act
Wednesday, July 1st, 2009Senate Bill 810, the Universal Health Care Act, proposes methods to provide affordable and attainable healthcare to all Californians. In a time where there are more uninsured individuals than ever before, and more stringent medical underwriting requirements (leaving those with pre-existing conditions ineligible for coverage), this bill could bring some much needed relief to our strained economy.
Under SB 810, eligibility would be based on residency. All residents would be covered, regardless of health status, employment status, or income level. Would this mean an increase in taxes? Well, theory states that over $200 billion dollars were spent in California on healthcare last year. By utilizing this enormous cash flow already being spent on healthcare by Federal, State, and County funds, such a plan is possible. By changing the way the funds are directed, such as purchasing prescription medication and durable medical equipment in bulk, California can save billions in the first year alone.
Ensuring fair reimbursements to providers, allowing consumers to choose their own doctors, and relying on a shared source of financial support, may be the answer to one of the biggest issues facing our State and Nation as whole.
The Argument Against Government Run Health Plans
Sunday, June 14th, 2009While many people think the answer lies in a Government run health insurance plan, but there is also a negative side to the theory. While the idea of health coverage for all is a dream worth pursuing, we need to make sure the quality of coverage is not sacrificed in doing so.
Currently, there are state and government run plans in place, such as Medicaid and children’s health insurance. While these programs benefit many people who would normally not have any coverage at all, concerns lie in the fact that there are lower reimbursement rates to providers, thus resulting in less access to doctors.
Obama’s plan is to allow those who have a plan they already like to keep their current coverage. However, should Employers have the choice between current higher premiums, or a lower cost option of the Government run plan, the lesser of the two would be elected. Therefore, employees would now be subject to a plan with more limited access to providers, and could possibly lose their current doctors altogether.
In terms of the doctor’s themselves, they may refuse the low reimbursement rates altogether and decide not to accept any insurance. Lower compensation would also means cuts in care and staff at your doctor’s office. Would-be physicians may decide to pursue more lucrative careers, instead of dealing with the red-tape of a government dictated medicine.
